Marinka Peschmann at December - 16 - 2009 Under Obama, U.S. News

Back in 2004, under the Bush Administration, it was revealed that the men and women of the US armed forces were sent to war without the proper equipment, now five years later, according to John Donnelly’s report at Congress.org, under the Obama Administration, the problem persists.

Soldiers’ complaints spur inquiry

Senior Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee have asked Pentagon leaders to explain repeated reports of inadequate equipment and training for troops headed to war.

At issue are rucksacks that cut off soldiers’ circulation, uniforms that do not provide sufficient camouflage in Afghanistan and that fall apart too quickly, and rifles that jam during use, according to committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) and Solomon P. Ortiz (D-Texas) chairman of the Subcommittee on Readiness.

Also of concern, the members said, were reports that troops are being sent to Iraq and Afghanistan “straight from boot camp” without enough stateside training.

The legislators expressed their concerns in a Dec. 10 letter to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Copies were also sent to Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey Jr. and Army Secretary John M. McHugh.

With roughly 200,000 U.S. military personnel slated to be deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan by mid-2010, the conditions faced by troops in harm’s way, always a worry on Capitol Hill, are expected to become even more of a congressional preoccupation in the months ahead. The Armed Services leaders’ letter underscores those concerns.

“These soldiers are fighting today on the front lines of Afghanistan, and we implore you to take their concerns to heart and see what we can all do to give them the tools they need,” Skelton and Ortiz wrote in the letter, which was obtained by Congressional Quarterly.

Skelton and Ortiz said they heard the complaints from infantry and airborne troops in Germany and Italy preparing to deploy to battle.

One of the allegations was that troops were being sent directly from boot camp to war without extensive training. “Many of the NCOs [non-commissioned officers] we spoke to would like to see their soldiers receive more training before deployment, a sentiment with which we strongly agree,” they wrote.

As for equipment, “numerous complaints” were heard about standard-issue “Army small assault packs and large rucksacks.” The rucksack, a new model, is made of plastic and its straps, soldiers reported, are “cutting off circulation to their arms and hands, making it virtually impossible to fire their weapons,” the members wrote. Many soldiers are using their own money to buy another kind of rucksack that they consider superior, the chairmen added.

Other complaints concern troops’ uniforms. In Afghanistan, soldiers said, the camouflage version of the Army combat uniform “does more to put our soldiers in harm’s way than to protect them,” according to the letter.

Read the full report.

Similar Posts:

                  
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe

12 Responses to “Inquiry: Are Soldiers Sent to the Battlefields Under Equipped?”

    Socco on December 17th, 2009 at 8:45 AM

    Super post, Need to mark it on Digg
    Have a nice day
    Socco

    Tom the Redhunter on December 20th, 2009 at 9:21 PM

    Marinka

    One, there’s a lot more to the issue of Humvee armor than the PBS story would have you believe. Please see this 2005 story in National Review by military expert W. Thomas Smith Jr., for starters.

    Second, we need to put this in perspective. Soldiers have gone into battle without the proper equipment from time immemorial, and will continue to do so no matter who is president or what he or she does.

    The best example was World War II. From beginning to end, the fighting vehicles our troops had were inferior to those of the Germans. Our M4 Sherman had both less armor and a smaller gun. Sure, we had more, but that meant that our tankers functioned as cannon fodder for the Germans until one of them could get close enough to get through the thicker armor on the German tanks. The troops called our tanks “Ronsons” after the cigarette lighter: “Lights Every Time!” This was a reference to the fact that our tanks went up in flames with the smallest hit.

    Look, contrary to what you must think at this point, no I’m not saying they don’t have what they need. I’m sure they don’t and every effort should be expended to get them what they need.

    Millard Davito on February 9th, 2010 at 4:27 PM

    On the whole, I am not very fond of politics in general – but, from time to time all of us have to pay attention. There are some very good arguments debated here, and I am taking notice – I am grateful to you.

    humvee armor on March 20th, 2010 at 5:12 AM

    [...] … the famous US Military Humvee workhorse, the Remote Control Humvee from Palco Sports has …Inquiry: Are Soldiers Sent to the Battlefields Under Equipped …Back in 2004, under the Bush Administration, it was revealed that the men and women of the US armed [...]

    Dzerdz5 on April 26th, 2010 at 5:57 PM
    Valera8 on April 28th, 2010 at 6:12 PM
    Valera12 on April 29th, 2010 at 6:07 PM
    Valera14 on April 30th, 2010 at 10:18 AM
    Yaroslav9 on April 30th, 2010 at 1:26 PM
    George11 on May 5th, 2010 at 8:02 PM
    TomPier on May 8th, 2010 at 1:55 PM

    great post as usual!

    Yaroslav4 on May 9th, 2010 at 9:45 AM